-
This post continues from :”When OEM meets the CBO: cardinality chaos across containers – Part 1“ Getting down to a single & simple query and using “FROM CONTAINERS” to my own advantage Let’s further “divide and conquer” –to confirm that each component of the “UNION ALL” being executed at the CDB level (which looks like that…
All tags
- 10046 trace (4)
- 10053 trace (5)
- 10200 Trace (1)
- Active Session History (1)
- Analysis of costing of joins in 10053 (1)
- Auto SQL Plan Management (3)
- AVG_DATA_BLOCKS_PER_KEY (1)
- AVG_LEAF_BLOCKS_PER_KEY (1)
- Batched I/O (1)
- cardinality (1)
- Cartesian Join (2)
- CBO costing (3)
- CDB / PDB (2)
- CLUF (4)
- Clustering Factor (4)
- Converting of CPU costing in 10053 (1)
- CPU_COST in 10053 trace (1)
- Exadata (4)
- FC HBA utilization (1)
- FC host (1)
- Flash (1)
- Flash disk (1)
- Hash Join (2)
- HBA (1)
- I/O throughput (1)
- index leaf block dump (2)
- index tree dump (1)
- large SGA (1)
- Linux (1)
- LRU (1)
- Nested Loop (2)
- NSMTIO (3)
- OEM (2)
- Offload (4)
- Oracle 23ai (3)
- Oracle performance (1)
- Oracle tuning (1)
- oradebug (2)
- Parallel Query (2)
- Performance Tuning (1)
- Resc (1)
- Resp (1)
- smart scan (3)
- Sort Merge Join (1)
- SQL baseline (3)
- SQL Monitor (2)
- SQL Plan (1)
- SQL Tuning (1)
- sql_id (1)
- system statistics (1)
- Temp tablespace (1)
- Tuning in Multitenant Architecture (2)
Latest posts
- When OEM meets the CBO: cardinality chaos across containers – Part 1
- When OEM meets the CBO: cardinality chaos across containers – Part 2
- Auto SQL Plan Management (look under the hood) – part 1
- Auto SQL Plan Management (look under the hood) – part 3
- Auto SQL Plan Management (look under the hood) – part 2
- Converting of CPU Costing in the Cost Based Optimizer 10053 Trace File
- Why this extra physical read while performing index scan?
- Clustering Factor (CLUF) – the anatomy and its impact on performance – part4
- Clustering Factor (CLUF) – the anatomy and its impact on performance – part3
- Clustering Factor (CLUF) – the anatomy and its impact on performance – part2